Federal Government to Investigate Whether MSHA Officials Conspired With Massey Energy Prior to the Upper Big Branch Explosion
Federal prosecutors are looking into whether the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) might have tipped off Massey Energy Company officials about inspections, prior to the events that led to the 2010 explosion at the Upper Big Branch mine. The explosion, the largest in West Virginia history, killed 29 workers.
The U.S. Attorney's office plans to look at testimony given by a former Upper Big Branch superintendent Gary May, alleging that federal MSHA inspectors regularly told company officials when they planned to visit the Massey-owned mine. May made these allegations as part of a deal to cooperate with the federal criminal investigation of the 2010 explosion. May had pleaded guilty to conspiring to violate mine safety standards and to cover up the resulting conditions.
May claimed that MSHA inspectors on the property would inform Upper Big Branch employees that they would be back to inspect the next day, and where they planned to inspect. While the inspectors only told a few individuals that they met, word would quickly spread to the other employees, including those who worked underground. May claimed that the practice predated his employment, and was a common practice at all of the mines where he had ever worked.
May's claims come in light of the fact that MSHA officials are focusing on a program set up by Massey where security guards gave underground crews notice of mine safety inspections. MSHA officials believe that these warnings gave Massey employees time to cover up any unsafe conditions at the Upper Big Branch mine and were a major contributor to the explosion.
MSHA officials disputed May's claims, stating that the agency never tipped off any workplace of a mine safety inspection. Information regarding inspections is meant to be restricted solely to MSHA personnel. Anyone who provides an advanced warning of an MSHA inspection faces up to six months in prison and $1,000 in fines.
Key Legal Takeaways & Summary
Essential West Virginia Legal Principles Established in This Case:
- •This analysis of "Federal Government to Investigate Whether MSHA Officials Conspired With Massey Energy Prior to the Upper Big Branch Explosion" highlights the essential legal protections and obligations established under West Virginia civil and statutory law.
- •While West Virginia workers' compensation provides statutory immunity for ordinary job injuries, exceptions exist under W. Va. Code § 23-4-2 for intentional safety violations ('deliberate intention').
- •Contractors, heavy machinery operators, and industrial employers are bound by strict state and federal (OSHA/MSHA) regulations that can substantiate third-party liability claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions and legal analysis regarding claims under West Virginia law:
When can an injured worker sue beyond basic workers' compensation in West Virginia?
An employee can pursue damages beyond workers' comp if the employer knowingly exposed them to a specific unsafe working condition in violation of industry safety standards, or if a negligent third-party contractor caused the hazard.
What are the reporting deadlines for workplace injuries in West Virginia?
Employees must promptly report injuries to supervisors and file formal claims within six months. Failure to document reporting immediately can compromise workers' compensation benefits.
Related Practice Resources & Analysis
Injured in West Virginia?
Don't wait to get the legal representation you deserve. Contact our experienced attorneys today for a free case evaluation.
Call (800) 559-8765